and out of 28 million there is 5-10 million dead consoles!
so that puts 360 to somewhere near 22 million unit sold by december's end!
as for ps3 i think its at 19-21 console sold! so the ps3 active consoles is pretty close to 360 active consoles!
if any idiot dont agree with these fact and believe MS lies then disagree with me!
because then people will accuse sony for under performing and under delivering and they have too many delays and why promise about games that takes years to come!!
we all know this accuses right? rigggggggggggght?????????
with all the price cuts!! i think they should be so proud of those numbers!
bubble me if u agree.
sometimes am surprised how much fools in N4G and that include u(sorry)!!
pp =Jason 360 = bloodmask and on and on! i believe themart is one of them also, i just cant believe that he will leave commenting in N4g, so he must have use another accounts!
already people knows that halo wars will be at best AA game, it cant be compared to killzone 2! they should compare halo wars with command and conquer 3!
then sony fanboys replied with Gears of war 2 then the bots again did their job with LBP and now with Killzone 2!!
the bashing
xbots = 3 ps3 games
ps3 fanboys = 1 360 game
clearly the bots have no life accept bashing in the internet and MS supporting them by throwing some cash at some reviewers and article writers!!
every low score for Killzone 2 from the bots just shows how powerful this game is!! its flattering actually! poor them, ...
to stay a live??
how did they make their poll or statistics?? i can go to some street that nintendo wii is so famous or xbox make my survey there and conclude that wii is the best then xbox!!! that not really the truth the truth will be closer if they made the survey in many states and in different locations and with different demographics!!
any way if this shows something then it shows how strong ps2 is!!! and why sony should drop the ball from it just yet!
something needs to be done about it, and for MS own sake jasper better be that good and safe to use!!! or else ps3 wont have competition in 2009 except from wii!
FTW
ps3 is where the games at, but if anybody insist on how poor sales it got and that because of the ps3 poor sales(its still ahead of 360 this year) he/she will throw away some money on a console who sold more and leave the best games then go ahead, u might as well buy a wii and DS since they sell a hell of amount of consoles!
sony playstation is always where the best games is located!!
at both level at the executable's and manager levels who poorly manage the projects to build such hardware
202k in 3 days for a knew IP, but i was still expecting ps3 to sell much more than it did, well i guess the price cut is the only trick for them to try to increase sales, i mean games and advertising is here already, value and functionality and extras is here already whats left to increase sales?? i say $300 price cut!!
no one should approve their stories any more!!
i lost my bubble for no reason, could u guys please bubble me up? i will do the same, thanks
approving such stories!
if thats true then that a negative point for MM, but also u have 100's of other good points in LBP! and MM is still working on it and updating it.
however its sad that MM is not putting any new free levels or at least the old expanded levels should be free, because i think this is like to keep the game a live for longer time and for more people to get motivated to buy the game, if i buy a game i will not spend a $1 on any expansions!!!
<...
thats the time the ps3 had its price cut to $400!!
i believe the ps3 cost somewhere near $300 right now! because that time ps3 had 90nm RSX and 65nm Cells, and the blue ray components was very expansive that time but now its much cheaper, i also believe during one year they managed to shrink the Cells and RSX even more and thats why i believe it cost ps3 near $300 if it was near $400 last year!!
ps3=win=BD=win=ps3+BD=win!!
i lost so many bubbles and i ...
thats my logic, if last year when they reduced the price from $600 60GB ps3 to $400 40GB ps3 they said that they r very good at reducing cost very quickly and that they managed to reduced the size of the cell from 90nm to 65nm and also they removed the ps2 graphic card chip and by that time the blue ray diode got somehow cheaper, so i remember in november last year sony's PRs said that the ps3 40GB version is costing them close to $400! so if thats the case then for sure now it will cost them...
only one bot with 100 account!!
about the article, LOL, ps3 costs a little bit more than 400 USD 1 year ago not now!! it was when they made the cell from 90nm to 65nm and that happened last year!! also when they removed the backward compatibility, that reduced the cost even more! since that time ps3 components got only cheaper and specially the blue ray, i really believe the cost of ps3 now is somewhere near 300 USD!!
FLOP.
about Metal gear solid killer?? or God of war Killer? or showdow of the colossus killer?
i personally think halo franchise is good but more like childish then a mature game, there is nothing to kill it for, and if anybody want to kill halo then they should make a cartoonish shooter game.